It is clear that sweet scents are mainly worn by the younger generation, such are also panty droppers ). But if you look at the comments and above all the statements, you notice that things are hardly objective there and that the trend towards the destruction of popular mainstream fragrances continues. There are certainly people who find that too sweet. Of course there are niche lovers who prefer exciting, complex fragrances or who only like certain fragrances, but people who rate this fragrance with a score of less than 5 do so maliciously. But does that make him bad? I have the feeling that people deliberately rate this fragrance worse only because it is praised on Youtube, for example, so that they feel like experts and defy the reviewers. Yes he is cute, yes he smells similar to other fragrances, yes he is often praised in online reviews. There is nothing but really nothing that justifies the current score of 6.2 for this fragrance. ![]() So many negative comments and statements because this fragrance is becoming mainstream and supposedly too sweet and perhaps resembles the 1 million. HEY, GUYS! THERE IS NO REASON TO JUDGE A FRAGRANCE UNOBJECTIVE AND NEGATIVE, JUST BECAUSE MANY PEOPLE HAVE WORN OR WEAR THIS FRAGRANCE! The same thing happened with the Sauvage and I think it will happen with this fragrance. Most ratings were based on the fact that 10 years ago almost everyone wore this fragrance. It started with the 1 million where suddenly everyone rated him so bad without any objective reason. ![]() But not a normal on the nerves go, but really on the Sa* go is that already.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |